MP3 Player with Bluetooth and Sports Clip | Earbuds Included, Expandable to 128GB | Bluetooth MP3 Music Player, HD Color Screen, 34 Hours Battery Life | SD and USB-C | Majority MP3 GO Music Player

I've been using it daily for 10 months now with no problems. Best one I've used under $50 (and I've tried many).Interface easy to use, has a shuffle option.

Nice sound, easy to use Bluetooth MP3 player.

I have had one of these before, but I lost it. So I ordered another. I have had this new one for four days now, and it will not power on. No matter what I do, the device just will not power on. I'm very disappointed.

This review compares the Majority MP3 GO and the Agptek A65 music players, which I purchased at the same time. I was using the Sansa Sport Clip Plus, which still plays music, but the clip broke after several years and the Bluetooth did not work well with either the TOZO NC9 Bluetooth Earbuds or TOZO A1 Bluetooth Earbuds, which I bought specifically to use with a music player. Based on specs on Amazon and on the products' websites the A65 and GO were the most similar music players that had the functionality I desired, which was: worked with the TOZO's; played a variety of music files; had compact, portable design for gym / exercise (I do not use my phone for storing and playing music); decent sound; easy / learnable navigation; useful functions.I've used both players with both sets of earbuds for over a week at the gym and outside; these are my main findings:1. Despite the Agptek having Bluetooth 5.3 while the Majority has 5.0, the latter seemed to work better. Especially outdoors, sometimes the Agptek's Bluetooth connection would stutter when the player was in my shorts pocket (it'd be fine if clipped to my shirt collar). The Apgtek's Bluetooth range is reported as 30' so it definitely underperformed. I don't know the Bluetooth range for the Majority, but rarely did it cut out when in my shorts pocket either outside or inside.2. The Majority does feel a bit more cheaply made, but I didn't like that the Agptek showed fingerprints more.3. The sound was the comparable and satisfactory for my needs for both players (don't have high expectations...they're $30 players) and had various EQ settings.4. I reload music (and by default charged somewhat) daily so I don't know if the products' claims for charging speed or playback time are accurate, but they've been sufficient for my use.5. Some customers reported players that were DOA, stopped working, wouldn't recognize files, or wouldn't pair with Bluetooth headphones or speakers; I haven't had these issues (I will update this review if that changes). I didn't find the right arrow = down / left arrow = up navigation on the Majority a dealbreaker as it was easy to learn (even if not the most intuitive). The manual print for both is small but there's probably an online version; I used a magnifying glass. I haven't used the included earbuds for either but, like with the sound, expectations should be kept low.6. In shuffle mode the Agptek repeats songs in randomized order once all songs have been played, whereas the Majority stops after the playing the shuffled songs once. I much prefer the way the Majority shuffled.7. I tried the recording function on the Majority and was impressed with the playback clarity. The Agptek has this capability, too, but I didn't test it.8. The Majority has animations for some of the function screens, which looks cool (if not unnecessary); the graphics on the Agptek are more basic.9. Agptek has a 1 year warranty while Majority has a 3 year warranty.I decided to keep the Majority and return the Apgtek because of the Majority's longer warranty, non-looping shuffling, and more stable Bluetooth connection with my earbuds. I would've preferred having dedicated up, down, left, and right buttons and a less plastic-y feeling unit, but these weren't dealbreakers. The Agptek has more features so if you want a pedometer, radio, or the ability to play videos or view photos, it may be a better choice. And of course, if whatever earbuds you use work better with one or the other, that may be the deciding factor.

I used to constantly use a Sansa Clip which was perfect until some moron decided to upgrade it to useless. This MP3 player works perfectly though it's a little larger(zippo size) than the than the Clip. I will buy another one at this price.

It does the basics, but the user interface so awkward and plays tracks on audiobooks out of order, even with careful file naming and organizing in folders/playlists. Apparently way to turn off "shuffle" despite trying to follow directions in the manual. But it does work okay.

I wanted to like this thing as a replacement for my Sandisk but I just cannot. Maybe my particular circumstances are different but I only use this at work and due to that, I cannot recommend this. I switch between music, books, and podcasts. Since I am at work, I generally will pause it and forget about it since I am doing something that requires my full attention. That means that I am not going to go through the 50 billion menus to manually add a bookmark. Plus, you only have a limited amount of bookmarks and you have to update them each time. I did not have to do this with the SanDisk.And it would be so easy to fix. Whoever wrote the software for this did not think to include the user experience in it. If this thing would just make automatic bookmarks or not hide it behind 50 billion menus, this device would be a slam dunk. I honestly do not understand how this company which made such a good technical product, totally blew it in terms of user experience.Another thing, I like to randomize/shuffle my music, not my book chapters and podcast episodes. Unfortunately, when you turn on randomize/shuffle, it applies it to everything until you turn it off. With the SanDisk, you had to turn on randomization/shuffle each time but you could do it within 2 button presses.Again, this product would be so good if they just used the SanDisk user experience for this thing.

Nice clear display. Works great. The earbuds that are included are just ok.